Description: Rehabilitation professionals conducting research activities.

Las investigaciones de casos y estudios transversales mejoran la práctica basada en evidencia entre los fisioterapeutas en Japón


Las investigaciones de casos y estudios transversales mejoran la práctica basada en evidencia entre los fisioterapeutas en Japón

rehabilitación terapia ocupacional fisioterapia logopedia práctica basada en la evidencia investigación estudios de casos revisiones bibliográficas estudios transversales estudios longitudinales.

Resumen

Este estudio investigó si ciertas actividades de investigación mejoran la actitud de los profesionales de rehabilitación hacia la práctica basada en la evidencia y su implementación en Japón.

Se incluyeron fisioterapeutas, terapeutas ocupacionales y del habla que trabajan en entornos clínicos.

Los resultados indicaron que la realización de estudios de caso y estudios transversales puede mejorar la implementación de la práctica basada en la evidencia entre los profesionales de rehabilitación en Japón.

Esto sugiere que los fisioterapeutas pueden mejorar su práctica clínica al realizar investigaciones en su campo.

Abstract original

Research activities contributing to evidence-based practice implementation in Japanese rehabilitation professionals

[Purpose] This study aimed to determine whether certain research activities improve the attitude of rehabilitation professionals towards evidence-based practice and its implementation in Japan. [Participants and Methods] We included physical, occupational, and speech therapists currently working in clinical settings. We employed hierarchical multiple regression analyses to assess the attitude of rehabilitation professionals towards evidence-based practice and research activities. Scores of the five dimensions of the Health Sciences-Evidence Based Practice questionnaire were considered the dependent variables. The five dimensions were as follows: Dimension 1, attitude towards evidence-based practice; Dimensions 2-4, evidence-based practice implementation; and Dimension 5, work environment related to evidence-based practice barriers-facilitators. The four sociodemographic variables (gender, academic degree, clinical experience, and the number of therapists at work) were initially included, following which self-reported research achievements were supplemented as independent variables (the number of case studies, literature reviews, cross-sectional studies, and longitudinal studies). [Results] We analyzed data from 167 participants. In addition to sociodemographic variables, the research achievements that statistically increased F-values of the modeling were case study achievements in Dimensions 2-3, cross-sectional study achievements in Dimensions 2 and 4, and longitudinal study achievements in Dimension 5. [Conclusion] Case studies and cross-sectional studies could improve evidence-based practice implementation among rehabilitation professionals in Japan.

Autores Haruka Mizuno
Takahiro Ueno
Hiroshi Takasaki
revista J Phys Ther Sci
DOI 10.1589/jpts.35.340